Identity and pronouns

A fictional ledger that separates identity, English pronouns, Japanese self-reference, speech style, and timeline.

Identity, English pronouns, Japanese self-reference, and gendered speech are separate facts. This fictional example shows the minimum useful record.

Core ledger

Character / identityEnglish referenceJapanese self-reference / addressSpeech evidenceContext or progressionAvoid
Asterman; he/himアタシ; あなたfeminine endings, poised evaluations, playful tagsMore formal in public; blunt with MinaShe/her pronouns or camp catchphrases.
Mina Kurosewoman; she/her; surname + titleclipped professional questions, restrained politenessContracts more under pressureTurning formality into emotional coldness everywhere.
Hana and Nanatwo women; she/her individually, they/them jointly, 私たち, names used as self-referencesingular and collective identity alternate by sceneSolo action can expose one sister's “I”Flattening every first person to “we.”
The Courierreveal-sensitive aliassource-compatible pronouns onlyvoice overlaps another character but is not proofCivilian identity locks only after B1:0144Global replacement with the later name.

Identity axes

Record these independently for every recurring character:

  • current displayed name, aliases, titles, and who uses each;
  • identity and approved English pronouns;
  • Japanese first- and second-person forms;
  • gendered, regional, foreign-marked, or otherwise nonstandard speech;
  • public/private code-switching and route progression;
  • earliest line where each identity fact is available to the player.

Speech style never proves identity or pronouns by itself. A male speaker may use feminine forms; a woman may use rough masculine forms; does not imply youth.

First-person audit examples

LineSource cueScene subjectRequired EnglishReason
A1:0082omitted subjectMina acts aloneIPrevious and following actions remain singular.
A1:0191我々Mina speaks for the bureauweInstitutional plural, not intimacy.
B1:0047Hana is physically separated from NanaIThe singular viewpoint is plot evidence.
B1:0060私たちboth sisters speak as a unitweExplicit collective self-reference.

An automated I/we search is only an inventory. Every candidate still needs scene-level adjudication, including lexical false positives and reciprocal English constructions.

Address changes are events

Track movement from title to surname, surname to given name, polite second person to blunt address, or adult self-reference to a childlike form. These changes can carry relationship or plot information and must not be normalized globally.

Release check

  • Every displayed speaker label maps to one ledger entry.
  • Every alias has a timeline and viewpoint rule.
  • All first-person singular/plural candidates were audited in context.
  • Gendered Japanese is reflected through voice, not unsupported English gendering.